2003
Lon
W. House
530.676.8956
February 21 was the
deadline for introducing new bills in
Summaries of air pollution bills
SB 700: Repeals a decades-old rule in state law that has shielded farms from
needing air pollution permits for diesel-powered irrigation pumps and for
confined-animal feeding operations such as dairies. Requires
farmers to obtain permits for those sources by
SB 701: Creates a low-interest loan program to help farmers pay for new
equipment or for installing measures to limit air pollution.
SB 702: Expands an existing state grant program that has helped farmers pay to
replace or retrofit dirty, diesel-powered irrigation pumps. Allows grant money
to be used for upgrading other farm equipment such as tractors.
SB 703: Revokes "standby" charges that agricultural customers must
pay utilities to keep irrigation pumps connected to the electricity grid. Could encourage farmers to use electricity rather than cheaper, but
dirtier, diesel fuel.
SB 704: Requires biomass facilities to regularly burn agricultural waste -- at
least 30% of their total fuel -- to produce electricity.
SB 705: Bans open-field burning by
SB 706: Prohibits most wood-burning fireplaces in all new homes starting
SB 707: Sets up buffer zones between dairies and cities by blocking new dairy
construction within 3 miles of an urbanized area or school. Prevents
schools or homes from being built within 3 miles of an existing dairy.
SB 708: Requires older cars and trucks to comply with state air emission
standards through the Smog Check program, but continues an exemption for
vehicles older than 45 years -- a concession to seldom-driven antique or
classic cars.
SB 709: Adds three public members with expertise in health, economics and the
environment to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Board.
Members would be appointed by the governor, the Senate Rules Committee and the
Assembly speaker.
Energy Bills Summary
SB
171: Establish policies to reform
the regulation of public utilities. Spot bill.
SCA 6: Constitutional
amendment that would require members of the California Public Utilities
Commission to be chosen during general elections rather than appointed by the Governor.
Commissioners would serve a maximum two 6 year terms
SB 46: Under current
law customers using distributed generation sources must be subject to the same
rates as customer not using DG, as long as DG begin operation between
SB 67: States
utilities would not have to achieve investment grade ratings to purchase
electricity from renewables.
SB 72: Dismantles
California ISO, and restores utilities to controllers.
SB 107: Current
language refers to report that the California Independent system operator must
file with the Legislature following FERC approval of the ISO. Spot bill.
SB
118:
Deals with the CPUC conflict-of-interest code. Spot bill.
SB
119:
Requires ISO to adopt rules that make more of its activities and prices
“transparent”. Spot bill.
SB
159:
SB 168: The CEC, which now makes quarterly reports to the
Legislature about the disposition of the Renewable Resources Trust Fund, would
make such reports yearly instead.
SB
183:
This bill would require the Energy Commission to provide regularly
updated information on funds remaining in the Emerging Renewable Resources Account
for rebates, buy downs, and other incentives.
SB
185:
This bill would require retail electricity suppliers to report power
source information to the CEC every year beginning
SB
888:
Spot bill. Would
repeal AB1890 –original deregulation plan.
SB 659: This bill would prevent electric companies from basing residential
customer rates on anything other than volume of consumption. The provision would
be in effect for an indefinite period of time. Under current law, the volume
charge restriction
would be lifted on
SB 697: This bill would direct the CPUC to establish separate distribution
rates and charges for renewable energy provided to customers via a community
choice
aggregator. “To the extent permitted by federal law,” the
rates would avoid charges for transmission services, according to the bill.
SB 703: For discounted rates for interruptible or off-peak demand service to
agricultural customers, the bill would bar the inclusion of “any demand charge,
connected load charge, facilities related charge or any similar fixed charge.”
SB 770: This bill, taking note that direct transactions between energy
suppliers and end-use customers are suspended under current law, seeks to ensure
that nonprofit cogeneration facilities can still directly serve their
affiliates.
SB 839: Aimed at preventing the sort of abuses alleged to have been committed
by Perot Systems, the measure would prohibit firms that win state consulting service
contracts from “being financially interested” in services or products
associated with the final work product provided by the company to the state.
SB 874: Another net-energy-metering measure in support of distributed
generation, this bill would allow customers who had net-metering systems
in-stalled before
SB 920: This bill would require Cal-ISO to receive legislative approval before
joining a regional transmission organization. In addition, the grid operator would
be responsible for revising its own bylaws rather than
that duty being entrusted to the Electricity Oversight Board. The bill, like AB
808, would scrap the EOB.
SB 1015: Under current law, customers using distributed generation must be under
the same rates and tariffs as customers in the same class who do not use DG.
Eligible distributed-generation re-sources must begin operation between
AB 425: would allow
heavy industrial customers receiving interruptible service from utilities to
continue to receive incentive based rates through 2008. Under current law interruptible services
supposed to disappear by March 3.
AB 428: Electricity
customers will be separated to core and noncore
accounts, similar to the way gas customers are treated. Customers using 500 kW or more would be
responsible for securing their all electricity supplies beginning in 2006. Utilities would not be obligated to serve
these noncore customers.
AB 151: Generators
importing power into the state would have to pay 0.1 cents per kilowatt hour to
mitigate emissions associated with that electricity. Would apply to generating facilities by
AB
404: similar AB 151, except the
power plant need only affect
AB 489. This declares
the state’s interest in developing distributed generation from oil production
operations that use flared gas as long as such efforts result in net air
quality benefits.
AB 426: This bill would allow for solar panels to be installed over water-conveyance
facilities operated by the Department of Water Resources.
AB 583: Current law prohibits public utilities under CPUC regulation from
selling or disposing of power plants before 2006. This bill would exempt from
those provisions the sale of or interest in generation located outside the
state as long as that generation is owned exclusively by a public utility that
serves 50,000 or fewer customers in
AB 816: This bill would make sure that newly formed municipal utilities do not
shirk their DWR cost responsibilities. The bill would affect only those munis formed since the energy crisis and taking over a portion
of another utility’s service territory.
AB 860: Under the Public Utilities Act, this bill would seek to exempt certain
power producers from being classified as “electrical corporations.” Such
generators would be those adjacent to and providing power to a seawater
desalination plant.
AB 925: Under this bill, developers of thermal power plants seeking an
expedited air-quality permit would have to satisfy fewer conditions. In
addition, contrary to current law, such a plant would no longer be required to
undergo modification or be shut down within three years. Owners would be
required to obtain emission offsets or pay emission mitigation fees.
AB 1214: This bill would promote the development of fuel cells by requiring
utilities to provide net-energy metering for customer generators. This rule
would be in place until January 2009 rather than January 2006, as prescribed in
present statute. The bill would also prohibit total statewide capacity for fuel
cell generators under this program from exceeding 350 MW.
AB 1352: This measure would further “the most efficient operation” of municipal
utilities by “re-structuring the functions and duties” of state agencies
overseeing
AB 1684 and 1685: AB 1684 would exempt from Department of Water Resources surcharges those customers who
leave the utility system in favor of using solar installations. AB 1685 would
direct the CPUC to set up a self-generation incentive pro-gram for solar energy
supplies. The commission already has such a pro-gram in place for customers
using distributed-generation resources. The bill also would abolish the
Electricity Oversight Board.